
There are many times where, while I begin to write on some subject, I lead to something different.There are, had reported the German philosopher Schopenhauer three types of writers: a) those that write from memory and they are the most , b) then those that think the hour where they write and are many˙they think in order to write, he says and g) those that already have thought and naturally they are rare.Me,I do not know in which category of writers I am classified according to first (perhaps in second…), but I can declare without bias that all the three categories have one only common point˙the purpose.For me the writing is not nothing other despite from an attempt to meet the truth.The contestation constitutes constitutive department of human nature, base of philosophy and wet nurse of scientific research. In some cases I reflect the Roman maxim “I think, hence exist” and wonder that, if it happened sometimes and we knew genuine, we would continue existing ?I had read somewhere that with the dialogue,that is to say open,without bitterness discussion, we approach the truth, but we can never capture it, comparing as a prey . We are not therefore nothing more than hunters with arm the pen or still the pencil,and generally anything slips on t o the paper.Of course the last one is not always easy and often in deed dangerous enough, so that we lose our intellectual balance.That's what is occasionally heard: “how much truth bears each time the spirit of each one of ?”. Even now, this moment where I lean the keyboard, I am unable to compose a hierarchical structure of thoughts, because simply I did not learn to walk in one only way˙the bypasses I can't not to follow them, even if I deviate from initial course.I prefer to wander,to ask,to search,to despair, than to reach to my destination, thing that would automatically means also the pause in this search .To remember and the verses of Kavafis “ however, observe what Ithaca gave you”. When they show you the moon, never you try to look at, because easily this drifts you.Always to be focused in the course to this. Exactly for this reason threre are times where I have deposited my opposition to the markers of reports-essay, when the last ones point out the erroneous syllogistic planning of student, signing depreciatorily “except subject”. I wander: what is the subject?To write no one standardised ready expressions of professor with who happened the student to be prepared or to extended in space and in time? For me the any subject constitutes simply the passage from general and vague, in determined and specified.However,the concrete can require more time than what is granted in the examinations (I am limited exclusively in the Greek nations). They leave consequently free the space (no one does not have the right reproaches the orientation of content), but committing the time!Such an attempt of writing, is incomplete.I stop here-I keep it for a different unit. “Writing, I discover”. It could be also formulated otherwise: “The examinations despize the knowledge”. The'ts therefore the new one removed from this suspension (even the title should,as I believe,to begin to be afraid!). Come now bastards of the ministry you mark it!!